Provocative exploration and exposé of human nature and attempts to suppress the truth about it
In this summary you will learn
- What “human nature” means
- Why people are not “Blank Slates” at birth
- Why the “Noble Savage” doctrine is wrong
- How the 20th century academic establishment fought to suppress the truth about human nature
getAbstract rating
| getAbstract rating |
Importance |
|
Innovation |
|
Style |
|
| Level of Expertise |
Why you should read The Blank Slate
This book covers a lot of ground: philosophy, genetics, cognition, sociology and academic infighting. Steven Pinker, writing with persuasiveness and craft, shows why the doctrine of the “Blank Slate” became so important to 20th century intellectuals that they were willing to lie, cheat, libel and even threaten those who dissented. Yet, the dissenters were right. Given what science now knows of genetics, the idea that people are blank slates at birth is simply untenable. getAbstract finds that the author, despite a few hints of personal prejudices (ah, there’s human nature again), does an excellent job of grappling with enormously challenging subjects.
About the Author
Steven Pinker is a psychology professor at Harvard University. His research on visual cognition and the psychology of language earned prizes from the National Academy of Sciences and the American Psychological Association, which gave The Blank Slate two major book awards.
Do you like this summary?
Ähnliche Zusammenfassungen
-
Hot Button Marketing
Push the Emotional Buttons That Get People to Buyby Barry Feig
-
The Moral Landscape
by Sam Harris
-
Future Minds
by Richard Watson
-
Streetlights and Shadows
by Gary Klein
Vom gleichen Autor
-
The Stuff of Thought
Language as a Window into Human Natureby Steven Pinker



