The development of neuroeconomics: Was Descartes right – or does economics have a better way to explain behavior?
In this summary you will learn
- How reflex theory was developed
- Why probability theory is important in understanding behavior
- What the new science of neuroeconomics provides
getAbstract rating
| getAbstract rating |
Applicability |
|
Innovation |
|
Style |
|
| Level of Expertise |
Why you should read Decisions, Uncertainty, and the Brain
This book offers an outstanding survey of philosophy, psychology, brain science, economics, and the field that brings them all together, neuroeconomics. Paul W. Glimcher contends that Descartes’ deterministic theory that simple behavior operates according to reflexes is influential far beyond its merits. He describes numerous experiments that support a very different understanding of behavior, which says that organisms seeking to fulfill their own goals (mostly to perpetuate their genes) must “choose” behaviors that somehow account for risk and return. In other words, they maximize “inclusive fitness” under conditions of uncertainty. Laboratory experiments and field research by behavioral ecologists lend considerable support to this view. getAbstract recommends this solid, layman’s introduction to neuroeconomics and a remarkable series of discoveries.
About the Author
Paul W. Glimcher is an associate professor of neural science and psychology at the Center for Neural Science at New York University.
Do you like this summary?
Customers who read this summary also read
-
Bounce
Mozart, Federer, Picasso, Beckham, and the Science of Successby Matthew Syed
-
Future Minds
by Richard Watson
-
The Decision Book
by Mikael Krogerus and Roman Tschäppeler
-
The New North
by Laurence Smith



