Join getAbstract to access the summary!

Why Most Things Fail

Join getAbstract to access the summary!

Why Most Things Fail

...And how to avoid it

Faber and Faber Ltd.,

15 min read
10 take-aways
Text available

What's inside?

Evolutionary biology may reveal more about business failures than random economics explains.

Editorial Rating

10

Qualities

  • Innovative
  • Applicable

Recommendation

This excellent, short work by Paul Ormerod is a worthy successor to his remarkably successful Butterfly Economics. As he did in that work, he draws here on lessons from biology to explain phenomena in economics. He covers a wide range of subjects, time periods and theories, all tied together (though not without some straining at the rope) by an inquiry into failure. Although Ormerod makes every effort to keep the work accessible, that scarcely makes it is easy reading. Readers who lack at least a nodding acquaintance with scientific writings and economic studies may find this hard slogging indeed. With that caveat, getAbstract thinks that readers who have a background in this field should pay serious attention to Ormerod’s ideas. The notion that failure is inherent and inevitable for many systems ought to guide business strategies and - especially - government regulation.

About the Author

Paul Ormerod was the head of the economic assessment unit at The Economist and the director of economics at the Henley Center for Forecasting in England. He taught economics at the universities of London and Manchester, and was a founder of a major consulting firm.


Comment on this summary

  • Avatar
  • Avatar
    H. B. 1 decade ago
    Beautifull ideas. A pity the conclusion is far too overreaching.
    The author proves governments should stop interfering with individual companies or economic sectors. He doesn't give any argument for any other government function.

    It's also strange he never played with the idea the government is part of the "ecosystem" in which companies evolve. And so it will change along with those companies.

    So it's a beautifull idea, but the conclusion is simply wrong.