Summary of A Federal Backstop for Insuring Against Cyberattacks?

Looking for the article?
We have the summary! Get the key insights in just 5 minutes.

A Federal Backstop for Insuring Against Cyberattacks? summary
Start getting smarter:
or see our plans

Rating

7

Qualities

  • Eye Opening
  • Overview

Recommendation

Technology is challenging insurers’ long-held notions about coverage, as cyberspace increasingly becomes the locus of liability. Insurance companies have excluded coverage for losses due to “acts of war” for more than 100 years. But conflicts between nations and attacks by terrorists have moved online, threatening commercial interests and the insurance industry’s long-term solvency. This thought-provoking exploration of sector challenges from experts Aaron Klein and Scott R. Anderson offers important considerations for state officials and financial executives.

About the Authors

Aaron Klein and Scott R. Anderson are fellows at the Brookings Institution.

 

Summary

Insurers usually exclude war-related damages from coverage to protect their solvency.

Since before the start of the 20th century, insurance companies’ policies have excluded coverage for destruction arising from “acts of war” because of the enormous costs. In times of conflict, it is up to the government to provide compensation, if any, to those whose lives are disrupted by military violence, leaving private insurers to concentrate on more common forms of risk.

In response to the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in the United States, Congress enacted the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act...


More on this topic

Customers who read this summary also read

Fifty Shades of Green
7
Climate Change and Financial Risk
7
Behavioral Development Economics
8
Kidnap
8
The Financial Crisis and the Free Market Cure
7
Fiscal Therapy
8

Related Channels

Comment on this summary