Summary of Age Discrimination and Hiring of Older Workers

Looking for the report?
We have the summary! Get the key insights in just 5 minutes.

Age Discrimination and Hiring of Older Workers summary
Start getting smarter:
or see our plans




Projections call for the percentage of Americans aged 65 and older to increase from 19% of the working-age population in 2017 to 29% by 2060. This demographic bulge will put enormous strain on Social Security by raising the proportion of nonworkers in the population. An astute analysis from economists David Neumark, Ian Burn and Patrick Button reveals that, despite government efforts to keep older people in the labor pool, discriminatory hiring practices may force them to retire. getAbstract recommends this important and accessible study to economists, employers and social scientists interested in the effects of age bias on older populations.

About the Authors

David Neumark is an economics professor at the University of California, Irvine, where Ian Burn is a doctoral student in economics. Patrick Button is a Tulane University assistant professor of economics.



An aging population in the United States is almost certain to test the viability of programs such as Social Security in the coming years. Some efforts toward policy reform – such as raising the age to access full retirement benefits and reducing taxes on earnings for workers who claim benefits – have focused on increasing employment among older Americans. However, this goal will be difficult to achieve if age discrimination by employers curtails hiring. Without part-time or “bridge” jobs to carry them to retirement, seniors will be unable to reduce the burden on government programs through continued...

More on this topic

Customers who read this summary also read

Women vs. Capitalism
Not Working
Closing the Gender Gap
Behavioral Development Economics
From Managing Decline to Building the Future

Related Channels

Comment on this summary