Summary of Can Prejudice Ever Be a Good Thing?

Looking for the video?
We have the summary! Get the key insights in just 5 minutes.

Can Prejudice Ever Be a Good Thing? summary
Start getting smarter:
or see our plans

Rating

8 Overall

9 Applicability

7 Innovation

8 Style


Recommendation

Prejudice gets a bad rap, and rightly so. Yet people praise patriotism, cherish their alma maters, revel in their ethnic heritage, and hold family near and dear. These insider behaviors are as natural to human beings as walking upright. Psychologist Paul Bloom casts prejudice in a new light, explaining that in-group versus out-group bias, though innate, only becomes harmful if not tempered by empathy, awareness, judgment and intellect. getAbstract applauds Bloom’s unbiased approach to prejudice.

In this summary, you will learn

  • Why every human is prone to prejudice and bias,
  • Which situations can make bias and stereotyping harmful,
  • How to counterbalance the negative effects of bias.
 

About the Speaker

Paul Bloom is a professor of psychology at Yale University.

 

Summary

People usually equate prejudice with acts of ignorance and evil. Yet prejudice and bias are innate human traits. Humans categorize people and things into familiar contexts to enable survival and navigation of the greater world. Thus, stereotypes and generalizations can be useful. People also divide ...

More on this topic

By the same author

Against Empathy
Against Empathy
8
The Origins of Pleasure
The Origins of Pleasure
7

Customers who read this summary also read

How We Can Build AI to Help Humans, Not Hurt Us
How We Can Build AI to Help Humans, Not Hurt Us
7
CEDA Women in Leadership Series
CEDA Women in Leadership Series
7
Let's End Ageism
Let's End Ageism
8
Machine Intelligence Makes Human Morals More Important
Machine Intelligence Makes Human Morals More Important
8
The Era of Blind Faith in Big Data Must End
The Era of Blind Faith in Big Data Must End
9
How Whistle-Blowers Shape History
How Whistle-Blowers Shape History
7

Related Channels

Comment on this summary