Summary of Changes in U.S. Family Finances from 2010 to 2013

Looking for the report?
We have the summary! Get the key insights in just 5 minutes.

Changes in U.S. Family Finances from 2010 to 2013 summary
Start getting smarter:
or see our plans




  • Analytical
  • Eye Opening
  • Hot Topic


The Federal Reserve surveys US households on their finances and credit conditions every three years to gauge Americans’ economic health. Plowing through the morass of analytics, charts and tables in this latest edition, released in late 2014, is not easy, but it is revealing: Years after the financial crisis, the top of the heap is gaining, the bottom of the pile is losing and those in the vast middle are going nowhere. getAbstract suggests this statistics-laden report to analysts and policy makers who are intrigued by the troubling income and wealth accumulation trends it uncovers.

About the Authors

The authors work in the division of research and statistics at the Federal Reserve Board.



Despite an improving economy in the United States from 2010 to 2013 – when GDP grew 2.1% and unemployment declined from 9.9% to 7.5% – income and wealth disparities among US households widened, according to the latest triennial Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF). The previous SCF – for 2007 to 2010 – showed a narrowing of differences among income groups, but by 2013 income concentration at the top coincided with falling incomes farther down the scale. Income decreases for the bottom 90% benefited the top 3% in 2013.

A 4% rise in average family incomes (to $87,200...

More on this topic

By the same authors

Are Disappearing Employer Pensions Contributing to Rising Wealth Inequality?
A Wealthless Recovery?
Inequality in 3-D
Recent Trends in Wealth-Holding by Race and Ethnicity
The Evolution of Retirement Wealth

Customers who read this summary also read

The CEO Pay Machine
From Great Recession to Great Reshuffling
Global Inequality
The Value of Debt in Building Wealth
The Geography of Prosperity
The 100 Most Overpaid CEOs

Related Channels

Comment on this summary