Summary of Constitutional Limits to Paternalistic Nudging
In:Choice Architecture in DemocraciesAnne Van Aaken, 2015
Hart and Nomos © 2015
Looking for the book?
We have the summary! Get the key insights in just 10 minutes.
“Paternalistic nudging” is a form of “choice architecture” that you may not realize affects many of your day-to-day decisions. Take, for example, the graphic warnings on cigarette packages: They steer many people away from smoking, via personal choice, despite smoking being completely legal. In this selected chapter, University of St. Gallen law professor Anne van Aaken introduces various paternalistic measures and analyzes their effectiveness. She asks whether the ends justify the means and if the means are lawful under the German Constitution. getAbstract recommends this thought-provoking article to anyone with interests in psychology, autonomy and the rights and responsibilities of government.
In this summary, you will learn
- What “paternalistic nudging” entails,
- Which types of nudges may be unconstitutional, and
- How appropriate paternalistic nudges can encourage an informed and thoughtful citizenry.
About the Author
Anne van Aaken, PhD, is a professor of law and economics, legal theory, public international law, and European law at the University of St. Gallen in Switzerland.
Comment on this summary
Customers who read this summary also read
The Atlantic, 2016
Alexander Osterwalder et al.
Global Peter Drucker Forum, 2017
First Round Review, 2016