Summary of Constitutional Limits to Paternalistic Nudging

Looking for the book?
We have the summary! Get the key insights in just 10 minutes.

Constitutional Limits to Paternalistic Nudging summary
Start getting smarter:
or see our plans

Rating

8 Overall

9 Importance

9 Innovation

7 Style

Recommendation

“Paternalistic nudging” is a form of “choice architecture” that you may not realize affects many of your day-to-day decisions. Take, for example, the graphic warnings on cigarette packages: They steer many people away from smoking, via personal choice, despite smoking being completely legal. In this selected chapter, University of St. Gallen law professor Anne van Aaken introduces various paternalistic measures and analyzes their effectiveness. She asks whether the ends justify the means and if the means are lawful under the German Constitution. getAbstract recommends this thought-provoking article to anyone with interests in psychology, autonomy and the rights and responsibilities of government.

In this summary, you will learn

  • What “paternalistic nudging” entails,
  • Which types of nudges may be unconstitutional, and
  • How appropriate paternalistic nudges can encourage an informed and thoughtful citizenry.
 

About the Author

Anne van Aaken, PhD, is a professor of law and economics, legal theory, public international law, and European law at the University of St. Gallen in Switzerland.

 

Summary

A “paternalistic nudge” is any measure that attempts to guide you toward a decision that will enhance your well-being without prohibiting your “freedom of choice.” A liberal society champions autonomy and reflective thought, allowing citizens the right to self-determination. This applies even when individuals...

Get the key points from this chapter in 10 minutes.

For you

Find the right subscription plan for you.

For your company

We help you build a culture of continuous learning.

 or log in

Comment on this summary

More on this topic

Customers who read this summary also read

More by category