Summary of Retreat from a Rising Sea

Looking for the book?
We have the summary! Get the key insights in just 10 minutes.

Retreat from a Rising Sea book summary

Rating

9 Overall

10 Importance

8 Innovation

8 Style

Recommendation

The “retreat” in this book’s title isn’t a description, but a prediction. Orrin H. Pilkey, Linda Pilkey-Jarvis and Keith C. Pilkey – co-authors of previous environmental books – argue that rising sea levels will doom coastal development. They say that in many areas beach renourishment and seawall construction will prove expensive and futile. Decades from now, they predict, people will be forced to abandon Miami, New Orleans, Norfolk and other coastal cities. The authors criticize the US government’s flood insurance program for encouraging building in low-lying areas instead of strategizing movement away from the coasts. They also warn of the danger of locating nuclear plants near the shore. Climate change skeptics may not appreciate the Pilkeys’ fatalistic mindset. However, they also present a compelling overview of a potentially devastating problem and of what government is and isn’t doing to mitigate its risks. While always politically neutral, getAbstract recommends their insightful, well-researched report to investors, city planners, policy makers and anyone living near the sea.

In this summary, you will learn

  • How high sea levels will rise,
  • How the change will affect developed areas and
  • How cities must respond to an overflowing ocean.
 

About the Authors

Orrin H. Pilkey is James B. Duke professor emeritus at Duke University. Linda Pilkey-Jarvis is a geologist and Keith Pilkey is an administrative law judge. The three have collaborated on previous environmental books.

 

Summary

Fighting the Oceans
For two centuries, two trends have been on a collision course. Sea levels are rising, and people are moving closer to the water. Half of the globe’s population lives fewer than 40 miles from the coast, and many megacities are near the water. Spurred by ocean shipping...

Comment on this summary

  • Avatar
  • Avatar
    Katie BOURDET 3 weeks ago
    Yet again here we see short term personal gain that eats reason and responsability.
  • Avatar
    Ashish Agarwal 6 months ago
    I disagree to the extent this report criticizes the government actions listed - people have freedom to choose where they live and government is supporting their respective choices, nothing wrong with that. Moreover, there are no historical precedence of successful mass migrations/ relocations being suggested.

    Although, I agree there is insufficient action - public or private, in effectively fixing the problem that extravagant and irresponsible human activities has created, and this is an area this report is very weak in, like most all other on this topic.

    I suppose it is much easier and gratifying to scandalize the problem, complain others for inaction, and play no role in actually solving/ identifying solutions to the problem yourself.
  • Avatar
    Azra Rizal AZRA.RIZAL@GMAIL.COM 1 year ago
    Lack of political will

More on this topic

Customers who read this summary also read

More by category