For several decades, pundits and academics in the United States have lamented the demise of the “public intellectual” – the well-respected thinker who keeps a mirror to society and informs the public debate. Doctoral student David Sessions, who draws heavily on the work of political scientist Daniel W. Drezner, argues that a new group of articulate and highly-paid “thought leaders” has filled the vacuum that these academically-minded intellectuals have left in their wake. But here is the catch: Instead of analyzing and criticizing society, this new generation of thought leaders mostly promotes the worldview and political agendas of the superrich. getAbstract recommends this sobering article on how America’s tiny new class of plutocrats is manipulating the public discourse and shaping public opinion to media professionals, social activists and concerned citizens.
In this summary, you will learn
- What distinguishes “thought leaders” from traditional “public intellectuals,”
- How thought leaders cultivate a symbiotic relationship with the superrich and
- How American corporations are using academic research to advance their own ends.
About the Author
David Sessions is a doctoral student in modern European history at Boston College.
Get the key points from this article in 10 minutes.
For your company
We help you build a culture of continuous learning.
Comment on this summary
Customers who read this summary also read
Nassim Nicholas Taleb
World Economic Forum, 2017
The Atlantic, 2017
The New York Times, 2017