Summary of Values and Vaccines

Looking for the article?
We have the summary! Get the key insights in just 5 minutes.

Values and Vaccines summary
Start getting smarter:
or see our plans

Rating

8 Overall

10 Importance

8 Innovation

7 Style

Recommendation

Scientists and journalists alike often assume that parents who refuse to vaccinate their children are, at best, uninformed, or, at worst, willfully negligent. But what if there were another side to this story? In this groundbreaking essay, science journalist Maggie Koerth-Baker goes in search of a new, philosophically-based narrative to explain why parents – especially the well-off, and well-educated – reject mandatory vaccination for their children. getAbstract recommends her article to everyone working in public health and to the parents of young children.

In this summary, you will learn

  • Why mandatory vaccination matters for public health,
  • Why some parents reject vaccination even when the risks of doing so are known, and
  • Why the conflict between scientists and anti-vaxxers is philosophical in nature.
 

About the Author

Maggie Koerth-Baker writes the monthly column Eureka for The New York Times Magazine. Her most recent book is Before the Lights Go Out: Conquering the Energy Crisis Before It Conquers Us.

 

Summary

The rationale behind vaccination laws and the risks – both personal and societal – of not vaccinating a child are manifold. Vaccinations work to prevent disease in the vaccinated individual; but they also work to create “herd immunity”: When the majority of people vaccinate, it cuts down on chances ...

Get the key points from this article in 10 minutes.

For you

Find the right subscription plan for you.

For your company

We help you build a culture of continuous learning.

 or log in

Comment on this summary

More on this topic

Customers who read this summary also read

More by category