Join getAbstract to access the summary!

Why Bad Ideas Refuse to Die

Join getAbstract to access the summary!

Why Bad Ideas Refuse to Die

The Guardian,

5 min read
5 take-aways
Audio & text

What's inside?

How do long-refuted theories and ideas re-emerge and thrive in public discourse?

auto-generated audio
auto-generated audio

Editorial Rating

8

Qualities

  • Innovative

Recommendation

People can stubbornly cling to false theories and wrong information – in science as much as in everyday life. Steven Poole, author of Rethink: The Surprising History of Ideas, argues persuasively that the reason behind the persistence of nonfactual, often long-disproved ideas isn’t necessarily ignorance. He presents the good and bad effects of “zombie ideas” in both academic and public discourse. getAbstract recommends this article to scientists, conspiracy theorists and anyone curious about the persistence of unconventional notions in a (somewhat) rational world.

Summary

According to the theory of the “marketplace of ideas,” public discourse should, over time, winnow out wrong ideas. And yet, people cling to notions that researchers have long dismissed and theories that lack backing by hard evidence. Such “zombie ideas” survive in public – even academic – discourse.

On social media, people have resuscitated the belief in a flat Earth, claiming that a conspiracy is behind the view of a round globe. Ignorance alone can’t explain the allure of such seemingly ludicrous claims. The flat-Earth theory and other zombie ideas persist because...

About the Author

Steven Poole is the award-winning author of Rethink: The Surprising History of New Ideas and other books.


Comment on this summary

More on this topic

Related Channels