Summary of Dangerous Convictions

Looking for the book?
We have the summary! Get the key insights in just 10 minutes.

Dangerous Convictions book summary
Start getting smarter:
or see our plans




  • Innovative
  • Well Structured
  • Overview


Public approval of the US Congress has reached historic lows. To understand the reasons, heed these reflections from one of its former members. Tom Allen represented the First Congressional District in Maine in the House of Representatives for 12 years. From 1997 to 2009, he witnessed few legislative achievements – more often, he saw two political parties at a perpetual impasse. Since leaving Congress, Allen has reflected on the roots of that dysfunction. He places much of the blame at the intersection of Republican ideas about individualism and small government and Democratic Party ideas about government’s role in helping people. Allen shares his experience in this thoughtful, while clearly pro-Democratic Party, treatise. He suggests remedies, none of which will be easy or could happen overnight. While always politically neutral, getAbstract suggests that observers with varying philosophies will find food for discourse here.

About the Author

Tom Allen is a former two-term Democratic congressman from the state of Maine.



Loggerheads and Language

Tom Allen – a Democrat elected to the House of Representatives from the state of Maine in 1996 – looked forward to serving his constituents when he took office, but he made a disheartening discovery. Whatever issue he tackled – campaign finance limits, prescription drugs for Medicare recipients or saving the oceans – his public policy ideas clashed with the philosophical “worldview” of the Republicans in the House majority. The powerful Republican Party (GOP) had swept into power in the House in 1994, under the leadership of Speaker Newt Gingrich and House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, and its adherents based their decisions to support or oppose legislation solely on their credo of “smaller government, lower taxes.”

Republicans and Democrats had widely differing impressions of the world, each other and their own parties. GOP members of Congress believed that government was slow and inefficient compared to the power of the marketplace. Democrats had more faith in Washington’s ability to aid citizens when they needed help. They viewed their Republican colleagues as less sympathetic to lower income Americans and more enamored of wealth. The GOP, ...

More on this topic

When the Center Held
The Upswing
Move Fast and Break Things
Good Business
Truth Decay
The Chief

Related Channels

Comment on this summary

  • Avatar
  • Avatar
    S. R. 7 years ago
    I'm not sure if it's Get Abstract's bias or the author's bias coming through but I was not able to get any legitimate information from this book.

    One thing that stood out was that most things democrat were put in like this while most things republican were "put in like this".

    I don't find the heavy handed approach to quotation marks, which I read largely as ironic/sarcastic/etc., to be effective applied in this manner.

    I think both parties are too blame and both are (at least partially) incorrect. One flaw to point out is that the republican party's tendency towards individualism bars cooperation. Read "The Evolution of Cooperation" (found on Get Abstract) and you can certainly see how cooperation can be one of the most self-interested things people can do.
    • Avatar
      Erica Rauzin 7 years ago
      Dear Mr. Reincke,

      As to the quotation marks, I hasten to assure you that there is no irony or sarcasm whatsoever.

      Any time that getAbstract uses material that is verbatim from the book we are abstracting, we put it in quotation marks. It's that simple. It is important to us that our readers know that while we are, in fact, neutral politically (after all, our home base IS Switzerland), we are very passionately opposed to plagiarism.

      Thank you very much for your comments.

      Erica Rauzin
      Managing Editor
  • Avatar
    A. 8 years ago
    Dangerously interesting summary of this book. Good style
    • Avatar
      gerry halmagyi 8 years ago
      I would agree with this review comments, especially the "Dangerously" interesting. The author however redefines the meaning of "Common good" and the nature of government to align with his beliefs, anything which opposes is dysfunctional.