Summary of Does hosting a World Cup make economic sense?

Looking for the article?
We have the summary! Get the key insights in just 5 minutes.

Does hosting a World Cup make economic sense? summary
Start getting smarter:
or see our plans




Conventional wisdom says that large-scale events, such as the Olympic Games or the World Cup, confer economic sparkle to host cities and countries. The truth is a bit different, as outlays for these extravaganzas tend to far outweigh their benefits, saddling hosts with debt and limited purpose structures that become monuments to excess. The World Economic Forum’s Stefan Hall cautions that leaders should consider long-term costs versus short-term gains. getAbstract recommends this engaging read to tax-paying sports fans around the world.

About the Author

Stefan Hall is with the Information and Entertainment System Initiative at the World Economic Forum.



Holding a World Cup would appear to be a good investment: Boosters promise an increase in tourism, the launch of large-scale infrastructure projects and the heightened visibility of the host city and country as good venues in which to conduct business. Russian officials estimate the economic impact from the 2018 World Cup to be as great as $30.8 billion by 2023. However, the costs of such events typically exceed the benefits. Stadiums are expensive to build, taking up a limited supply of valuable real estate. Additionally, their infrequent use fails to justify their ongoing maintenance...

More on this topic

Customers who read this summary also read

Is China’s New Payment System the Future?
Billion Dollar Whale
The Global Risks Report 2019
The Prosperity Paradox
Why the Coronavirus Could Threaten the U.S. Economy Even More Than China’s
Globalization Isn’t Dying, It’s Just Evolving

Related Channels

Comment on this summary