Summary of Central Banks: Reform or Abolish?

Looking for the report?
We have the summary! Get the key insights in just 5 minutes.

Central Banks: Reform or Abolish? summary
Start getting smarter:
or see our plans

Rating

7 Overall

6 Importance

7 Innovation

7 Style

Recommendation

In this contrarian critique of central banks, Cato Institute senior fellow Gerald O’Driscoll makes a compelling case for letting competing banks issue their own forms of exchange and for a return to the gold standard. O’Driscoll doesn’t identify a source of political will for such an upheaval, but he embraces the notion with zest. getAbstract recommends his ideas to investors, policy makers, business students and anyone seeking insights about central banking.

In this summary, you will learn

  • Why economist Milton Friedman argued in favor of monopolistic central banks and
  • Why competing currency issuers are a better idea.
 

About the Author

Gerald O’Driscoll is a senior fellow at the Cato Institute. He is an expert on global monetary and financial issues.

 

Summary

Central banks’ monopoly on money leads raises a simple question: Should central banks exist? Economic theory holds that a monopoly should exist only for a good reason. In 1960, economist Milton Friedman – believing that free and open competition leads to an unfettered issuance of money – held that only...

Get the key points from this report in 10 minutes.

For you

Find the right subscription plan for you.

For your company

We help you build a culture of continuous learning.

 or log in

Comment on this summary

More on this topic

Customers who read this summary also read

More by category