Governments generally promote public investment in infrastructure development projects as a catalyst for sustainably faster economic growth. But Andrew M. Warner, an economist at the International Monetary Fund, says that economic slumps are more likely to follow public investment drives in low-income countries. Inadequate or corrupt implementation can undermine even the most promising civic undertaking. Diminishing returns on investment and irrational or nonexistent project screening and selection are just a few of the problems Warner highlights in a series of dated but illuminating case studies on past government investment programs in Mexico, Bolivia, South Korea, the Philippines and Taiwan. getAbstract suggests this well-researched report to economists, development specialists and analysts as an alternative point of view on state investment in capital projects. Those seeking a deeper understanding of public capital investments and their presumed role as economic growth catalysts will find much to ponder in this evaluation.
In this summary, you will learn
- How governments justify and promote public investments
- Why publicly funded projects aren’t effective long-term economic stimulants, and
- What unintended consequences can result from government-spurred capital projects.
About the Author
Andrew M. Warner is an economist at the International Monetary Fund.
Get the key points from this report in 10 minutes.
For your company
We help you build a culture of continuous learning.
Comment on this summary
Customers who read this summary also read
Ingrid Holmes and Sam Maule
Diane Whitmore Schanzenbach et al.
The Hamilton Project, 2017
International Monetary Fund
World Economic Forum
World Economic Forum, 2016