Since their beginnings in the early 1970s, video games have become more and more graphically sophisticated. But it wasn’t until the mid-1990s that people started questioning the morals of this genre. Freelance critic Jonathan McCalmont explains why morally sound people ditch their ethics at their games consoles and suggests the mind-sets of gamers are parallel to those of heads of states. Whether in charge of the game or a state, he says, people adopt a mind-set that focuses on the big picture, losing sight of the individual. getAbstract recommends this analysis to anyone with an interest in the gaming industry or looking for an unusual perspective on politics.
In this summary, you will learn
- Why video games turn even the most liberal of individuals into morally detached oppressors and
- How the state perspective allows people in power to make decisions that seem to disregard individual welfare.
About the Author
Jonathan McCalmont is a freelance critic living in the United Kingdom. He has contributed to Strange Horizons, The Escapist and The New York Review of Science Fiction. He also comments at his blog, Ruthless Culture.
Get the key points from this article in 10 minutes.
For your company
We help you build a culture of continuous learning.
Comment on this summary
Customers who read this summary also read
The New Yorker, 2016
Thomas Ripsam and Louis Bouquet
Peter S. Goodman
The New York Times, 2016
The Atlantic, 2016