Summary of The Affordable Care Act
Examining the Facts
A clear, in-depth, neutral appraisal of the US Affordable Care Act debate.
Health care affects everyone. Americans pay more for it and receive less in return than the people in any other industrialized nation. It accounts for almost one-fifth of America’s GDP and employs millions of people. The controversy and confusion surrounding the Affordable Care Act (ACA) – which represented the biggest change in US health care history – continues unabated years after its narrow, entirely partisan passage in 2010 under the nickname “Obamacare.” Few Americans understand the ACA. Exaggerated claims, sensationalism and outright lies from both sides of the debate make the whole thing incomprehensible to many. Health care policy professor Purva H. Rawal’s objective, nonpartisan reference guide to the ACA may not have you on the edge of your seat, but you’ll come away understanding the law, how it reached this stage and where US health care may be headed. Given the presidential election results, more change is likely. While always politically neutral, getAbstract recommends this manual as rich in research and long on facts.
In this summary, you will learn
- What developments led to the passage of the Affordable Care Act,
- Which claims from both sides of the debate are trustworthy and which are not, and
- What changes the ACA has wrought and what future changes may await.
About the Author
Purva H. Rawal, PhD, served as a US Senate staffer during the ACA debate and joined the nonprofit sector to help implement the ACA and advise industry. She teaches health care policy at Georgetown University.
Comment on this summary
3 months agoI have listen to hundreds of book is on getAbstract but this one is by far so erroneous and full of lies it is hard to believe they published it. I am an employer with 50 employees and the ACA has been a total disaster premium cost rising 25% sometimes year over year and was cancellations a policies and frustrated employees with the system that is filled with bureaucracy and red tape
3 months agoGiven the strong election rhetoric, and now the repeal and delay message, I doubt they have a thoughtful substitute planned. They will repeal it so they meet the election promise but a 3 year delay is nothing but a charade.
4 months agoThis is old news and has been beaten to death in the media since the Act was passed. A better use of time is to keep an eye on how the new administration will try to replace it given their promises that theirs will be better, cheaper, and will cover pre-existing conditions.
Customers who read this summary also read
Friedrich A. Hayek
University of Chicago Press, 2011
Elaine C. Kamarck
Brookings Institution Press, 2016
Jeff Elton and Anne O’Riordan
Ali S. Khan
Public Affairs, 2016