Summary of The Decline of Drudgery and the Paradox of Hard Work

Federal Reserve Board,

Get the Report

The Decline of Drudgery and the Paradox of Hard Work summary
If you could work fewer hours, would you?

Rating

8 Overall

8 Applicability

9 Innovation

6 Style

Recommendation

Some people love their jobs, but most can’t wait for the weekend, for a holiday or for retirement. It might seem strange that, given the chance to work less, individuals would opt to work just as much. Citizens of OECD countries have worked roughly the same amount of hours since the mid-1950s, despite rising wages and consumption. If they can live as well on less time at work, why don’t they? The answers are complex – and the theory and mathematics rather dense – in this report from economists Brendan Epstein and Miles S. Kimball. getAbstract suggests their erudite investigation into why people toil to working men and women everywhere.

In this summary, you will learn

  • Why the number of hours an average OECD employee works has remained the same despite greater wealth
  • Why jobs are “getting nicer” than they used to be
  • How firms can cost-effectively improve their employees’ job satisfaction
 

Summary

In 1930, economist John Maynard Keynes forecast that, in the course of the 20th century, people would spend more time at leisure, because rising productivity would allow them to meet their financial needs with progressively fewer hours of work. Yet since the mid-1950s, the number of working hours has...
Get the key points from this report in less than 10 minutes. Learn more about our products or log in

About the Authors

Brendan Epstein is an economist with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Miles S. Kimball is a professor of economics at the University of Michigan.


Comment on this summary

More on this topic

Customers who read this summary also read

More by category