The story behind Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s rise and fall is a cautionary tale about what can happen when good government intentions have less than satisfying outcomes. The major role these firms played in fueling the 2008 financial crisis became apparent when the US government took them into conservatorship to protect some $5.2 trillion in mortgage debt. By mid-2015, with tighter lending standards, a better housing market and an improving economy, the financial picture for the two agencies looked much brighter than it was in 2008. Still, as this astute report from Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta says, long-term solutions that would make the mortgage market less vulnerable to shocks remain elusive. Federal Reserve economists W. Scott Frame, Andreas Fuster, Joseph Tracy and James Vickery do an excellent job of explaining the government’s role in saving Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, while also discussing some of the effort’s tactical shortcomings. getAbstract recommends this report to economists, bankers and anyone seeking new perspectives on past and current risks in the US residential mortgage finance market.
In this summary, you will learn
- How Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s financial problems arose,
- Why the US government took the two agencies into conservatorship during the 2008 financial crisis, and
- Why current solutions may not be sufficient to bring longer-term stability to the residential mortgage market.
About the Authors
W. Scott Frame is an economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta. Andreas Fuster, Joseph Tracy and James Vickery are economists at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
Comment on this summary
Customers who read this summary also read
Robert C. Pozen
Brookings Institution, 2018
International Monetary Fund
Penguin Press, 2016
Jane Ihrig et al.
Federal Reserve Board, 2017