Jason Brennan – a professor of strategy, economics, ethics, and public policy at Georgetown University – reflects on the benefits of limiting the right to vote to knowledgeable, well-informed people. He examines the inherent flaws of democracy and suggests “epistocracy” as an alternative. Brennan fails to address some of the disadvantages of the system he commends: Would people really accept the legitimacy of a government that they weren’t allowed to elect? Still, getAbstract recommends this provocative essay as food for thought for democracy enthusiasts and skeptics.
In this summary, you will learn
- What flaws are inherent to a democratic system,
- How “epistocracy” could mitigate these flaws and
- What an epistocratic political system could look like.
About the Author
Jason Brennan is an associate professor at Georgetown University and specializes in politics, philosophy and economics. He is the author of numerous books, among them Against Democracy.
Get the key points from this article in 10 minutes.
For your company
We help you build a culture of continuous learning.
Comment on this summary
5 months agoHis idea is provocative but nevertheless, holds some truth. But how do the "elite" know the problems of the less educated society? How will you ensure empathy?
By the same author
Princeton UP, 2016
Customers who read this summary also read
The New Yorker, 2016
Aspen Institute, 2016
TED Conferences LLC, 2015