With 500 top professional economists, 2,500 supervisory personnel, and an extensive network of formal and informal relationships throughout the financial sector, the Federal Reserve was in a unique position to foresee and perhaps prevent the financial crisis of 2008. So why didn’t it? Professors Stephen Golub, Ayse Kaya and Michael Reay scoured the printed records of what Fed insiders were saying behind closed doors in the years leading up to the crisis. The authors exercise their respective specializations in economics, political science and political sociology to understand why “the most powerful and prestigious economic agency in the world” didn’t see the catastrophe coming. getAbstract recommends this accessible, unsettling, eye-opening article to policy makers and Fed watchers.
In this summary, you will learn
- How the Federal Reserve dealt with the signs of a financial bubble before 2008,
- How traditional theories about its lack of action fall short, and
- Why the Fed was apparently unable to foresee the severity and depth of the crisis that unfolded.
About the Authors
Stephen Golub is an economics professor at Swarthmore College, where Ayse Kaya is an assistant professor in political science and Michael Reay is an assistant professor in political sociology.
Get the key points from this article in 10 minutes.
For your company
We help you build a culture of continuous learning.
Comment on this summary
2 years agoShouldn't there be a minimum standard by which the FOMC reviews and then reacts to economic indicators?
Customers who read this summary also read
Ben S. Bernanke
Brookings Institution, 2016
Federal Reserve Board, 2016
David Lopez-Salido et al.
Federal Reserve Board, 2015
Paul Goldsmith-Pinkham et al.
Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 2016