Market participants could realize the objectives of the Volcker Rule by monitoring banks’ risk.
To protect consumers following the 2008 financial crisis, the United States introduced the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act containing the Volcker Rule, which forbids financial institutions that rely on deposit insurance from proprietary trading. The aim was to reduce the moral hazard that entices banks to take excessive risks. Authors Hester Peirce and Robert Greene condemn the Volcker Rule and assert that market participants, not regulators, should monitor banks. Though always politically neutral, getAbstract believes this provocative article will ignite debate among economists and policy makers across the political spectrum.
In this summary, you will learn
- What the Volcker Rule stipulates
- Why some economists view it as counterproductive
- How federal deposit insurance encourages moral hazard
- How to trigger risk-monitoring behavior among banks’ depositors, creditors and shareholders
Comment on this summary
Customers who read this summary also read
Brookings Institution, 2016
Michael Kumhof and Zoltán Jakab
Finance & Development Magazine, 2016
Paul Goldsmith-Pinkham et al.
Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 2016
World Economic Forum
World Economic Forum, 2016