Economics professor David VanHoose puts forward a vigorous argument against using taxes to control bank behavior and protect the banking system from future shocks. He contends that such measures would prove ineffective in real-world banking. Though some of VanHoose’s assumptions will meet with opposition, getAbstract believes his ideas will trigger discussions on banking tax among finance professionals, regulators and government policy makers.
In this summary, you will learn
- Why some economists propose using a new tax to curb certain banking behaviors,
- What adverse consequences that tax would have for banks and the banking system, and
- What alternative approach offers a more viable solution.
About the Author
David VanHoose is an economics professor at the Hankamer School of Business at Baylor University.
Get the key points from this article in 10 minutes.
For your company
We help you build a culture of continuous learning.
Comment on this summary
Customers who read this summary also read
Michael Kumhof and Zoltán Jakab
Finance & Development Magazine, 2016
Richard S. Grossman
CESifo Group Munich , 2016
The Economist Intelligence Unit
EIU © 2016. Sponsored by Temenos, 2016
Gerold Grasshoff et al.
Boston Consulting Group, 2017