Summary of How Statistics Lost Their Power – and Why We Should Fear What Comes Next

Looking for the article?
We have the summary! Get the key insights in just 5 minutes.

How Statistics Lost Their Power – and Why We Should Fear What Comes Next  summary
Start getting smarter:
or see our plans


8 Overall

8 Importance

8 Innovation

8 Style


Statistics were once the authority on facts, but society has grown increasingly wary of them, especially of their use in politics. Sociologist and political economist William Davies explains what led to statistics’ fall from grace. He considers statistics in the context of their history and offers an opinion on why big data analysis can’t replace the service statistics provide for democracy. 

In this summary, you will learn

  • How statistics have influenced our understanding of the growth of nations,
  • Why modern society is turning its back on traditional statistics as a political tool and
  • How the era of digitization is influencing the collection of data and its interpretation. 

About the Author

Sociologist and political economist William Davies wrote The Limits of Neoliberalism and The Happiness Industry.



Statistics were once the go-to place for factual evidence. They have since become mired in mistrust. People fear the massaging of numbers for political benefit. Immigration is one example: Statistics show that immigration improves economic health. However, presenting such figures doesn’t convince people and instead makes them oppose immigration more. Conversely, emotional stories of immigrant family plights are more likely to sway public opinion.  

More on this topic

By the same author

The Happiness Industry

Customers who read this summary also read

The Long-Term Decline in Prime-Age Male Labor Force Participation
What Do Economists Actually Know?
Corporate Buybacks and Capital Investment
On the Referendum #21
Towards a Reskilling Revolution
Leveraging Integrated Data Systems to Examine the Effect of Housing and Neighborhood Conditions on Kindergarten Readiness

Comment on this summary