Summary of Paying for Risk

Looking for the report?
We have the summary! Get the key insights in just 5 minutes.

Paying for Risk summary
Start getting smarter:
or see our plans

Rating

7 Overall

7 Importance

8 Innovation

7 Style

Recommendation

In the rush to crack down on banks’ risk taking after the 2007–2009 financial crisis, politicians and regulators focused on precisely the wrong issue: They restricted pay for bank executives while ignoring the reality that lower-level staff, rather than executives, actually take on the risk. According to legal experts Simone M. Sepe and Charles K. Whitehead, in a competitive market for talent, those employees can sell their services to rival institutions, moving on before their risky bets collapse. getAbstract recommends their report on bank compensation to policy makers, finance leaders and human resources professionals looking to link risk and pay.

In this summary, you will learn

  • Why limits on bank executive pay won’t reduce risk and
  • What three changes would make pay more rational and risk-taking more reasonable.
 

About the Authors

Simone M. Sepe is an associate professor of law at the University of Arizona. Charles K. Whitehead is a law professor at Cornell Law School. This report will appear in Volume 100 of Cornell Law Review.

 

Summary

After the 2007–2009 financial crisis, authorities misguidedly focused on limiting pay for bank executives, though nonexecutives are the real risk takers. Consider Bruno Iksil, JPMorgan’s trader who earned $6.76 million in 2011 but lost the bank $6.2 billion in 2012, and Goldman Sachs’s Fabrice Tourre...

Get the key points from this report in 10 minutes.

For you

Find the right subscription plan for you.

For your company

We help you build a culture of continuous learning.

 or log in

Comment on this summary

More on this topic

Customers who read this summary also read

More by category