Who delivers greater value to companies needing legal work: in-house lawyers or outside counsel from law firms? In search of answers, Duke University’s Steven L. Schwarcz conducted surveys of in-house lawyers and, using a shorter form, of external law-firm attorneys. He details eight different hypotheses, develops quantifiable survey data and uses this data as a prism through which to answer the question: Is it better for companies to “make or buy” legal expertise? Because Schwarcz asks lawyers to respond to surveys about their merits versus their competitors, he raised the caveat, of course, of self-evaluation bias. Despite this anomaly, and the report’s tendency to jump from topic to topic, getAbstract finds that this research will interest corporate hiring officers, in-house legal counsel, and lawyers serving or seeking corporate clients.
In this summary, you will learn
- Why companies increasingly are shifting transactional legal work to in-house lawyers,
- What eight hypotheses explain this trend and
- What survey data reveal about this process.
About the Author
Steven L. Schwarcz is the Stanley A. Star Professor of Law and Business at the Duke University School of Law, and the founding director of Duke Global Capital Markets Center.
Comment on this summary
Contained in Knowledge Pack:
Knowledge PackPracticing LawThe law is more than a business – but, it is still a business: How to handle the ethics and economics of lawyering
Customers who read this summary also read
The Huffington Post, 2015
Center Street, 2017