Summary of Chairman and CEO
The Controversy over Board Leadership Structure
Stanford Business, 6/2016
Is it helpful or harmful for a CEO also to serve as his or her company’s chairman of the board?
Does moving away from a dual CEO/board chair corporate governance structure lead to better company oversight and performance? Not always, according to David F. Larcker and Brian Tayan of Stanford University. In this succinct report, Larker and Tayan use a sampling of 187 top firms to explore the logic, logical fallacies and statistics surrounding separation of the CEO and board chair roles. They raise pertinent questions for companies considering changes to their leadership structures. getAbstract recommends this report to business leaders and corporate shareholders.
In this summary, you will learn
- Why some companies choose to combine or separate the CEO and board chair roles
- How separating the two roles affects company performance
About the Authors
David F. Larcker is senior faculty member of the Center for Corporate Governance at Stanford. Brian Tayan is a researcher with the Corporate Governance Research Program at Stanford.
Comment on this summary
Customers who read this summary also read
Martin Reeves et al.
Boston Consulting Group, 2/2016
Nicolas Kachaner et al.
Boston Consulting Group, 4/2016
AIIM © 2015, 2015
Hans-Paul Bürkner et al.
Boston Consulting Group, 2015