Review of Moral Tribes

Joshua Greene

Looking for the book?
We have the summary! Get the key insights in just 10 minutes.

Rating

The rating – what does it mean?

At getAbstract, we summarize books* that help people understand the world and make it better. Whatever we select for our library has to excel in one or the other of these two core criteria:

Enlightening – You’ll learn things that will inform and improve your decisions.

Helpful – You’ll take-away practical advice that will help you get better at what you do.

We rate each piece of content on a scale of 1–10 with regard to these two core criteria. Our rating helps you sort the titles on your reading list from solid (5) to brilliant (10). Books we rate below 5 won’t be summarized. Here's what the ratings mean:

10 – Brilliant. A helpful and/or enlightening book that, in addition to meeting the highest standards in all pertinent aspects, stands out even among the best. Often an instant classic and must-read for everyone.
9 – Superb. A helpful and/or enlightening book that is extremely well rounded, has many strengths and no shortcomings worth mentioning.
8 – Very good. A helpful and/or enlightening book that has a substantial number of outstanding qualities without excelling across the board, e.g. presents the latest findings in a topical field and is written by a renowned expert but lacks a bit in style.
7 – Good. A helpful and/or enlightening book that combines two or more noteworthy strengths, e.g. contains uncommonly novel ideas and presents them in an engaging manner.
6 – Notable. A helpful and/or enlightening book that stands out by at least one aspect, e.g. is particularly well structured.
5 – Solid. A helpful and/or enlightening book, in spite of its obvious shortcomings. For instance, it may offer decent advice in some areas while being repetitive or unremarkable in others.

While the rating tells you how good a book is according to our two core criteria, it says nothing about its particular defining features. Therefore, we use a set of 20 qualities to characterize each book by its strengths:

Applicable – You’ll get advice that can be directly applied in the workplace or in everyday situations.
Analytical – You’ll understand the inner workings of the subject matter.
Background – You’ll get contextual knowledge as a frame for informed action or analysis.
Bold – You’ll find arguments that may break with predominant views.
Comprehensive – You’ll find every aspect of the subject matter covered.
Concrete Examples – You’ll get practical advice illustrated with examples of real-world applications or anecdotes.
Controversial – You’ll be confronted with strongly debated opinions.
Eloquent – You’ll enjoy a masterfully written or presented text.
Engaging – You’ll read or watch this all the way through the end.
Eye opening – You’ll be offered highly surprising insights.
For beginners – You’ll find this to be a good primer if you’re a learner with little or no prior experience/knowledge.
For experts – You’ll get the higher-level knowledge/instructions you need as an expert.
Hot Topic – You’ll find yourself in the middle of a highly debated issue.
Innovative – You can expect some truly fresh ideas and insights on brand-new products or trends.
Insider’s take – You’ll have the privilege of learning from someone who knows her or his topic inside-out.
Inspiring – You’ll want to put into practice what you’ve read immediately.
Overview – You’ll get a broad treatment of the subject matter, mentioning all its major aspects.
Scientific – You’ll get facts and figures grounded in scientific research.
Visionary – You’ll get a glimpse of the future and what it might mean for you.
Well structured – You’ll find this to be particularly well organized to support its reception or application.

*getAbstract is summarizing much more than books. We look at every kind of content that may matter to our audience: books, but also articles, reports, videos and podcasts. What we say here about books applies to all formats we cover.

Qualities

Innovative
Scientific
Engaging

Review

“Us” versus “Them” dynamics have occupied a central place in human society since time immemorial. In this intriguing book, psychologist Joshua Greene explores the resource-based reasons why people tend to fight those outside their “tribe” – such as the desire for decent places to live, good food, healthy bodies and enough time to enjoy the people they care about – as well as the more ephemeral causes of conflict. According to Greene, tribes often fight each other because they have different conceptions of what it means to live in a good and just community. Such clashes have only grown as life has become more globalized, Greene notes. Still, there is hope if people can find ways to speak across their differences.

Greene delves into a number of subject areas in the course of his examination of the causes of and cures for moral conflicts – including neurology, psychology, social science and philosophy – and does not shy away from academic terminology. Not all readers will find Greene’s claims about the possibilities inherent in his version of utilitarianism, which he calls “deep pragmatism,” entirely convincing; nevertheless, the text is rarely dry or boring. Moreover, the author’s original research, engaging examples and practical suggestions will interest anyone bewildered by the strident ethical conflicts so prevalent in today’s world.

About the Author

Joshua Greene is an experimental psychologist, neuroscientist, philosopher and Professor of Psychology at Harvard University.

The “Tragedy of the Commons” illustrates a core problem in getting people to cooperate.

Joshua Greene begins his exploration of the problem of moral conflict with a hypothetical situation: Suppose you are one of a group of people raising livestock on relatively limited common land. When an animal is sold at auction, its owner receives the profits, even though everyone contributed, via the common land, to the expense of raising it. Given this arrangement, each individual has an incentive to continue adding animals to his or her herd. But if every individual in the group behaves in accordance with that self-interest, the grazing land they all hold in common will soon be destroyed. The conflict between self-interest and collective interest, which ecologist Garrett Hardin termed the “Tragedy of the Commons,” is sometimes, but not always, a part of group dynamics, Greene writes. Indeed, it only rears its head when the interests of the individual are out of sync with those of the group; and even then, they are not mutually exclusive.

Ethics evolved in order to make cooperation possible.

In the wake of Darwin’s theory of natural selection, the question arose: How did ethics or morality among humans evolve? “Survival of the fittest” would, after all, seem to reward pure egotism rather than cooperation and compromise. Nonetheless, Greene states, people often decide to allow the interests of the group to rule. Humans evolved to facilitate this kind of cooperation, but only with certain categories of people: those who are part of their “tribe” or with whom they have a personal relationship. This is because of the competitive nature of evolutionary biology: Cooperation between groups must be limited, and cooperation with members of your own group must offer an advantage – less of a chance, for example, of going hungry. Morality is, therefore, an adaptive tool of both cooperation and competition.

Read on