Summary of Naturals and Strivers

Looking for the report?
We have the summary! Get the key insights in just 5 minutes.

Naturals and Strivers summary
Start getting smarter:
or see our plans


8 Overall

9 Importance

9 Innovation

7 Style


Are so-called prodigies – Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, Pablo Picasso, Bobby Fischer and Shirley Temple – more talented than those who “strive” for expertise? Most experts claim not. However, research from social psychologists Chia-Jung Tsay and Mahzarin R. Banaji reveals that authorities may, inadvertently, favor innate talent when evaluating performance. getAbstract believes this eye-opening examination will help those working in human resources and university admissions departments make better – and less biased – decisions for their organizations.

In this summary, you will learn

  • What constitutes “naturalness bias,”
  • What experiments revealed about the naturalness bias and
  • What implications the naturalness bias has for hiring and admissions experts.

About the Authors

Chia-Jung Tsay is an assistant professor in the University College London’s School of Management. Mahzarin R. Banaji is a social psychologist at Harvard University.



In all walks of life – education, athletics, music, art, science and business – people evaluate the “talent” of others. The judgments of experts, in particular, can have a great influence on your future; they serve as “gatekeepers,” deciding whom to choose, reward, coach and promote. In the United States...

More on this topic

Customers who read this summary also read

If You Cut Employees Some Slack, Will They Innovate?
Winning the Race for Women in Digital
Surviving as an “Old” in the Tech World
Facial Recognition Technology
How America Lost Faith in Expertise
How Youth Navigate the News Landscape

Related Channels

Comment on this summary