Facebook lost billions of dollars in market value after it became public knowledge that Cambridge Analytica, a data firm that worked for President Donald Trump’s 2016 election campaign, harvested data from millions of Facebook users and used the information to change the outcome of the election. The data breach has created such public outrage that few people have questioned the scandal’s underlying assumption: that Cambridge Analytica’s voter targeting campaign succeeded at influencing voters. Antonio García Martínez, a former product manager at Facebook, doesn’t believe it did – and explains the reason for his skepticism in an opinion piece for Wired. getAbstract recommends his analysis to advertising industry professionals and anybody interested in questioning the conventional wisdom in a rapidly evolving news scandal.
In this summary, you will learn
- How Cambridge Analytica tried to infer political leanings from people’s online behavior and
- Why Cambridge Analytica’s targeted advertising campaign was most likely ineffective.
About the Author
Antonio García Martínez is a tech entrepreneur, best-selling author, and an Ideas contributor for Wired.
Comment on this summary
Customers who read this summary also read
The Observer, 2018
The Baffler, 2018
Peter Waldman et al.
Bloomberg Businessweek , 2018