Summary of The EBA EU-Wide Stress Test 2016

Looking for the report?
We have the summary! Get the key insights in just 5 minutes.

The EBA EU-Wide Stress Test 2016 summary
Start getting smarter:
or see our plans

Rating

7

Qualities

  • Comprehensive
  • Analytical
  • Innovative

Recommendation

European banks are diverse and engage in different forms of risk-taking, so assessing their fundamental stability is no easy task. Researcher Willem Pieter De Groen finds that the current European Banking Authority stress test offers greater insights into existing problems, such as nonperforming loans and corporate and government debt exposures, than into banks’ underlying soundness and risk resilience. getAbstract recommends this scholarly analysis – written more for the banker, economist and regulator than the layperson – for its cogent arguments in favor of a more robust methodology for bank stress testing.

About the Author

Willem Pieter De Groen is a research fellow at the Center for European Policy Studies.

 

Summary

According to the July 2016 outcomes of a biannual stress test administered by the European Banking Authority (EBA) to 51 European bank groups, a wide disparity exists in banks’ ability to weather certain economic and financial shocks. On average, the “fully loaded common equity tier 1” capital of the banks tested could decline by 3.4% over three years, based on an unfavorable scenario. But the Italian Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena, because of the level of its nonperforming loans (NPLs), would lose 14.5%, while the Norwegian bank DNB would cede less than 0.1%.


More on this topic

Customers who read this summary also read

And the Weak Suffer What They Must?
8
History Credits Lehman Brothers’ Collapse for the 2008 Financial Crisis. Here’s Why That Narrative is Wrong.
8
Financial Stability Report
8
The Global Risks Report 2018
9
From Wall Street to Bay Street
8
World Economic Outlook April 2017
7

Related Channels

Comment on this summary