Summary of The Preprint Dilemma

Looking for the article?
We have the summary! Get the key insights in just 5 minutes.

The Preprint Dilemma summary
Start getting smarter:
or see our plans




  • Scientific
  • Applicable
  • Insider's Take


Preprint publishing is the sharing of manuscripts not yet reviewed by peers. The practice has gained support from major institutes, funding sources and leading researchers. As a result, preprints are now increasingly popular among biologists. Still, not everyone is convinced about the idea. Science staff writer Jocelyn Kaiser lays out some potential benefits and drawbacks of preprints. She highlights these points with views from current researchers. The article will serve as a guide for science enthusiasts curious about sharing research through preprints.

About the Author

Jocelyn Kaiser is a staff writer for Science. She has covered stories ranging from environmental science to biomedical research policy and the National Institutes of Health.



Preprints have risen in popularity among biology researchers since 2013.

In 2013, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory started bioRxiv, a preprint server for biology. Preprints have become more popular among biologists ever since. Major funding bodies like the UK Medical Research Council, the Wellcome Trust, the National Institutes of Health, and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute have championed the idea. Support from leading researchers, journals and The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative have helped preprints take hold as well.

The process of posting preprint is faster than peer review and benefits researchers early in their careers...

More on this topic

Customers who read this summary also read

English Is the Language of Science. That Isn’t Always a Good Thing
Medical Centers Spearhead China’s Pharma Push
Is the Staggeringly Profitable Business of Scientific Publishing Bad for Science?
How to Fix Science
Power Couple: Science and Technology

Related Channels

Comment on this summary