Summary of The rise of Bitcoin doesn’t mean the end of banks. Here’s why

Looking for the article?
We have the summary! Get the key insights in just 5 minutes.

The rise of Bitcoin doesn’t mean the end of banks. Here’s why summary
Start getting smarter:
or see our plans




  • Overview
  • Visionary
  • Hot Topic


As bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies gain more acceptance, many wonder if the blockchain technology behind it will usurp the role of banks. According to professors Dirk Baur and Niels Van Quaquebeke, the answer is a resounding no. By applying historical context to the bitcoin craze, the authors shed light on why the currency may be unworkable in the long term without a governing central authority. getAbstract recommends this thought-provoking article to bankers, investors and anyone interested in the future of bitcoin and blockchain.

About the Authors

Dirk Baur is a professor at the University of Western Australia. Niels Van Quaquebeke is a professor at the Kühne Logistics University in Hamburg, Germany.



Despite the increasing prominence of bitcoin, banks will undoubtedly continue to play a central role in the global monetary system for many years to come. The reason, quite simply, boils down to trust. Bitcoin relies on blockchain technology, an electronic mechanism that allows one party to send payments to another without going through a financial institution. Instead of trusting a bank, blockchain users place their faith in technology to make the transaction work. History shows that only a few cases exist in which a currency operated successfully without the guidance of a...

More on this topic

Customers who read this summary also read

The Blockchain and the New Architecture of Trust
Blockchain Babel
Bitcoin’s Guardian Angel
Digital Cash
DeFi: The Hot New Crypto Trend Of 2020
The Coming Currency War

Related Channels

Comment on this summary