Summary of To Disrupt or Not to Disrupt?

Looking for the article?
We have the summary! Get the key insights in just 5 minutes.

To Disrupt or Not to Disrupt? summary
Start getting smarter:
or see our plans




  • Analytical
  • Applicable
  • Well Structured


Market disrupters enter a market with a new or cheaper product hoping to capitalize on a weakness found in a traditional business – perhaps customers looking for cheaper or more convenient alternatives. Disruption is a choice, however, and opting to work with a legacy company can offer substantial benefits. Entrepreneurs should consider the strategies outlined by Joshua Gans in MIT Sloan Management Review. Gans offers a logical approach for entrepreneurs to weighing alternative, and often more successful, strategies to the path of disruption.

About the Author

Joshua Gans is a professor of strategic management and holds the Jeffrey S. Skoll Chair of Technical Innovation and Entrepreneurship at the Rotman School of Management at the University of Toronto. 



Market disrupters aim to capitalize on vulnerabilities in existing businesses.

Disruptive companies introduce new products into the market niches where traditional businesses fail to offer what their current and potential customers need. However, entrepreneurs should consider alternative approaches to directly competing with existing companies.

In the early days of the internet, Amazon offered consumers alternative ways to shop for books, decisively – and successfully – disrupting existing book stores. A similar strategy flopped for Webvan whose efforts to disrupt grocery stores failed to reach the necessary scale. In contrast...

More on this topic

Customers who read this summary also read

The New Disrupters
A Crisis of Ethics in Technology Innovation
The 11 Sources of Disruption Every Company Must Monitor
How Leaders Delude Themselves About Disruption
Disruption 2020
A Crisis of Legitimacy

Related Channels

Comment on this summary