Toyota Kata

Managing People for Improvement, Adaptiveness, and Superior Results

McGraw-Hill, 2009

15 min read

10 take-aways

Audio & text

What's inside?

Let go of classroom training and embrace real, continuous improvement through Toyota Kata.

1×

Editorial Rating

Qualities

Applicable
Well Structured
Insider's Take

Recommendation

If you have ever trained in martial arts, you may be familiar with “kata,” the term for a routine or pattern that improves your practice. Based on this approach, Toyota created a routine that supports continuous improvement. Engineer and continuous improvement expert Mike Rother explains that “improvement kata” and “coaching kata” form the invisible bonds that make Toyota successful. He explains essential improvement concepts like “PDCA” and “mentor-mentee dialogue” in detail, complete with case histories and examples. His text is dense, yet easy enough to digest if your background is in manufacturing. Fortunately, he loves schematic figures and explanatory drawings and they help guide the way. getAbstract recommends Rother’s insights to leaders in manufacturing eager to explore behavioral patterns and techniques that go beyond the known Lean Manufacturing toolkit.

Summary

“Toyota Kata”

Toyota is a profitable, competitively successful company that applies certain practices and values for success. A layer of invisible tools, routines and management techniques drives Toyota’s continuous improvement journey.

These routines helped Toyota cross “unclear territory” and move from where it was to where it wanted to be. To make that leap, Toyota came up with a set of procedural sequences called Toyota Kata that it repeats frequently to reach the results it wants. In Japanese, “kata” stands for “patterns” or “routines.” You can also translate kata as “a way of keeping two things in alignment.” Toyota Kata has two parts: an “improvement kata” and a “coaching kata.”

Approaches to “Process Improvement”

Your firm may be using workshops, “value-stream mapping” and to-do lists as tools to address process improvement. However, a three-day workshop seldom provides the desired work-process results. Using value-stream maps doesn’t improve processes; it just shows you where your end-to-end process harbors improvement potential. The list of pending actions is another flawed tool, since the number of open items...

About the Author

Engineer, researcher and teacher Mike Rother worked with Toyota on continuous improvement, and affiliates with the University of Michigan and other research institutions.

Comment on this summary

Sign in to share your opinion
P. B. getAbstract 3 years ago

Pareto Paralysis - this is what it means (Toyota Kata by Mike Rother):

A Toyota person once told me to focus on the biggest problem. However, when I tried to do this I noticed a negative effect: We got lost in hunting for and discussing what was the biggest problem. When we tried gathering data and making Pareto charts, it took a lot of time and the biggest problem in the Pareto chart was usually “other” which put us back into debating options. By the time we decided what the biggest problem was, the situation at the process had changed. This effect is called Pareto paralysis, and I encourage you to avoid it. Pareto paralysis delays your progress as people try to determine the “right” first step to take.

Conclusion: it matters more that you take the first step than what the first step is.

Mike Rother

Toyota Kata

Managing People for Improvement, Adaptiveness, and Superior Results

What's inside?

Editorial Rating

Qualities

Recommendation

Summary

“Toyota Kata”

Approaches to “Process Improvement”

About the Author

My Highlights

Comment on this summary

More on this topic

By the same author

Learners who read this summary also read

Related Channels