Summary of Why Philanthrocapitalism Can Change the World

Looking for the video?
We have the summary! Get the key insights in just 5 minutes.

Why Philanthrocapitalism Can Change the World  summary
Start getting smarter:
or see our plans

Rating

7 Overall

8 Importance

8 Innovation

7 Style


Recommendation

As the old adage warns, “You can’t take it with you.” Heeding this admonition, billionaires Bill Gates, Warren Buffett and others of their ilk have pledged to donate their riches. Could this new era of philanthropy rival the golden age of Andrew Carnegie and John Rockefeller? In this topical interview with The Atlantic editor Corby Kummer, Matthew Bishop, a business editor at The Economist, explains Americans’ philanthropic tendencies. getAbstract recommends Bishop’s thesis to the wealthy, particularly members of the 1%, who need guidance in giving.

In this summary, you will learn

  • Why a new golden age of philanthropy is emerging,
  • Why solving social problems necessitates capital donations from private philanthropists, and
  • Why philanthropy requires standard metrics to measure its impact and reduce waste.
 

About the Speakers

Matthew Bishop is a business editor at The Economist. Corby Kummer is an editor at The Atlantic.

 

Summary

In recent years, Bill Gates and Warren Buffett have kick-started a new wave of philanthropy. In fact, these do-gooders have more passion for altruism than for the activities that initially made them rich. Yet philanthropy is not a modern...

More on this topic

Customers who read this summary also read

The Transformation of Tomorrow
The Transformation of Tomorrow
8
How the US Should Use Its Superpower Status
How the US Should Use Its Superpower Status
7
Breaking the Wall of Radicalisation
Breaking the Wall of Radicalisation
7
WTF (What’s the Future?)
WTF (What’s the Future?)
9
Hoping for Prosperity
Hoping for Prosperity
8
What If We Replaced Politicians with Randomly Selected People
What If We Replaced Politicians with Randomly Selected People
9

Related Channels

Comment on this summary