Machine Bias

There’s software used across the country to predict future criminals. And it’s biased against blacks.

ProPublica, 2016

5 mins. de lectura

5 ideas fundamentales

Audio y Texto

¿De qué se trata?

Racial disparities show up in all levels of criminal justice. What if your efforts to be fairer backfired?

audio autogenerado

1×

Ingrese para escuchar el resumen en audio.

audio autogenerado

Editorial Rating

Qualities

Controversial
Analytical
Bold

Recommendation

Imagine a computer program that can predict if a criminal will strike again. Now, imagine that program isn’t accurate. ProPublica senior reporters and editors poke holes in one of the dozens of risk assessment programs that determine the fate of defendants across the United States. They found that one popular tool incorrectly flagged black defendants as likely reoffenders twice as often as it did for white defendants, exposing some to longer incarceration times. getAbstract recommends this revealing analysis to anyone enthusiastic or skeptical about the use of algorithms in the American judicial system.

Summary

Police arrested Brisha Borden and Vernon Prater separately for petty theft. But a computer program said Borden, who’s black, was more likely to reoffend, although Prater, who’s white, had a worse record. While Borden stayed out of trouble, Prater ended up serving time in prison for subsequent burglary and theft.

Dozens of US courts – and maybe federal prison soon – rely on risk assessments at each stage of the criminal justice process to assign bond and decide sentence length, although the results don’t have predictive value. Merely 20% of more...

About the Authors

Julia Angwin, Jeff Larson and Lauren Kirchner hold senior reporting and editing positions at ProPublica. Surya Mattu is a contributing researcher.

Comment on this summary

Sign in to share your opinion
N. P. 1 year ago

Problem and dilemma is very clear and also mentioned some of the key important factors. It could still more be better with more key facts and little longer.
A. J. 6 years ago

Thus, Machine Bias (that is, programmed bias) is simply an extension of faulty individual and societal biases; which are based on biased laws (still in existence) created with intent by biased individuals within that society for the dominant system to function as it does.

More on this topic

By the same authors

Article

Amazon Says It Puts Customers First. But Its Pricing Algorithm Doesn’t.

In our Journal

hace 1 año

Journal Article

Building a More Equitable Future

Applying the lessons of history to chart the future of technology Digital transformation affects every area of life and work, yet technological progress has not been equitable or inclusive, as a Microsoft map of areas in the US without access to broadband internet service vividly illustrates. Contrary to popular belief, technologies are not inherently neutral. […]

hace 1 año

Journal Article

The Four Horsepersons of the AI Apocalypse: Part Two

Why is success with Artificial Intelligence (AI) so elusive, and what can you do about it? Organizations make four key errors in their attempts to do something useful with AI. If there is a 95 percent chance of getting AI wrong, one or more of these factors is likely the cause, and your project will […]

hace 3 años

Journal Article

Robots Need Bias Awareness Training, Too

Despite their veneer of objectivity, algorithms are as biased as the humans creating them. It’s piñata time! Imagine you’ve invited a bunch of kids to your daughter’s birthday party. You find yourself at a loss watching them squabble over who gets to take the first swing at the papier-mâché lama filled with candy. To prove […]