跳过导航
On the Judgment of History
Book

On the Judgment of History

(Ruth Benedict Book Series)

Columbia UP, 2020
First Edition: 2020 更多详情


Editorial Rating

9

Qualities

  • Controversial
  • Comprehensive
  • Analytical

Recommendation

People discuss the lessons of history as if history itself is a moral arbiter. Everyone wants to end up on the “right side of history,” as professor Joan Wallach Scott explains. The Nuremberg Tribunal put history on trial. South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission exposed apartheid’s crimes and opened the way to a better future. Supporters of reparations for slavery argue that equality requires acknowledging slavery’s ongoing impact. The past and the future may seem clear-cut, but gauging history’s impact on the present is complicated and messy. Scholarly yet elegant, Scott’s book addresses how history’s traumas encroach on today’s political and moral reality.

Take-Aways

  • The “judgment of history” depends on seeing history as a straight line.
  • The Military Tribunal at Nuremberg turned the judgment of history into reality.
  • The Nuremberg trials treated Nazism as an historical exception and opened the possibility of something similar happening again.

About the Author

Joan Wallach Scott is Professor Emerita in the School of Social Science at the Institute for Advanced Study. Her most recent book is Knowledge, Power, and Academic Freedom.


Comment on this summary or 开始讨论

More on this topic

Learners who read this summary also read

Related Channels