A Better Way to Think About AI
Artificial intelligence is ready to collaborate. Why fixate on automation?
Recommendation
Should machines replace or support human expertise? MIT economist David Autor and Google Research head James Manyika argue that AI often works best as a partner, not a substitute, for human experts. While not categorically against AI fully taking over certain tasks, they warn that over-automation could erode critical human skills and lead to catastrophes. Offering clear examples and persuasive logic, Autor and Manyika make a robust case for balancing automation with collaboration as AI reshapes work and daily life.
Summary
About the Authors
David Autor, an expert in public policy and economics, teaches at MIT and codirects both the NBER Labor Studies Program and the Stone Center on Inequality and Shaping the Future of Work. James M. Manyika is senior vice president for research, labs, technology, and society at Google-Alphabet, overseeing Google Research. He has served as chair and director of McKinsey Global Institute and as vice chair of the National AI Advisory Committee.
By the same authors
Related Skills
Comment on this summary