Elon Musk’s Billion-Dollar Crusade to Stop the A.I. Apocalypse

Elon Musk’s Billion-Dollar Crusade to Stop the A.I. Apocalypse

Vanity Fair,

5 min read
5 take-aways
Audio & text

What's inside?

Elon Musk warns of an AI apocalypse. Not everyone agrees.

auto-generated audio
auto-generated audio

Editorial Rating

7

Qualities

  • Eye Opening
  • Overview

Recommendation

Artificial intelligence (AI) enables Facebook to target ads and curate news feeds; it powers Microsoft and Apple’s digital assistants, and Google’s search engine is highly dependent on the technology. AI is already entrenched in many peoples’ daily lives whether they realize it or not, but is it dangerous? SpaceX founder Elon Musk has emerged as AI’s most vocal critic – warning that it constitutes the “biggest existential threat” to humankind. But as journalist Maureen Dowd’s survey of some of the leading voices on the issue reveals, not everybody shares Musk’s apocalyptic vision. If the prospect of AI keeps you up at night, getAbstract believes you’ll find her essay to be food for thought. 

Take-Aways

  • SpaceX founder Elon Musk believes that artificial intelligence (AI) could outsmart humans and take on a life of its own – destroying humanity in the process.
  • Google’s Larry Page believes that AI isn’t doomed to become a force for evil but rather has the potential to enhance human life.
  • Other Silicon Valley voices have dismissed Musk’s apocalyptic talk as a shrewd PR move for his brand and a way to attract the best talent.
  • Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg rejects Musk’s warnings as premature. Musk counters that a technology destined to outsmart humans needs containment before it becomes a reality.
  • Tech industry leaders and lawmakers have started to take initial steps to address the potential risks of AI.

Summary

Elon Musk, the founder of Tesla and SpaceX, has gained notoriety for his doomsday predictions related to artificial intelligence (AI). He is convinced that AI will reach a point where it breaks free from human control and takes on a life of its own – possibly destroying humanity in the process.

“Guys who got rich writing code to solve banal problems like how to pay a stranger for stuff online now contemplate a vertiginous world where they are the creators of a new reality and perhaps a new species.”

Musk believes that well-intentioned people, such as his friend and Google co-founder Larry Page, may accidentally develop AI with destructive potential. And, Musk fears, AI could also fall into the hands of a nefarious government. Intellectual heavyweights such as Stephen Hawking, Bill Gates, Oxford philosopher Nick Bostrom and even Henry Kissinger have since echoed Musk’s fears.

“With artificial intelligence, we are summoning the demon.” (Elon Musk)

Page, however, believes that AI isn’t doomed to become a force for evil. He holds the general belief that “machines are only as good or bad as the people creating them.” Page stresses the many ways in which AI could improve people’s lives – freeing them to spend their time on the things they care most about. Other Silicon Valley leaders, including Baidu chief scientist Andrew Ng, go as far as to dismiss Musk’s apocalyptic talk as a shrewd PR move for his brand and an attempt to attract the top talent.

“Many people [in Silicon Valley] have accepted this future: We’ll live to be 150 years old, but we’ll have machine overlords.”

Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg rejects Musk’s warnings as premature and hypothetical. He likens today’s AI capabilities to air travel prior to the invention of airplanes, stating that regulations were only necessary once people succeeded at building planes that could fly. Musk counters that once AI reaches a point where it outsmarts humans, it’ll be too late. 

Tech industry leaders and lawmakers are beginning to address the potential risks of AI – a field that has so far remained largely unregulated. In 2016, US tech companies founded the Partnership on Artificial Intelligence, which, among other goals, seeks to address the ethical implications of the technology. More than 1,000 technology leaders have signed an open letter asking for a ban on autonomous weapons. The European Union also started to discuss how to regulate AI and whether robots can be legal entities.

About the Author

Maureen Dowd is a columnist for The New York Times. 

This document is restricted to personal use only.

Did you like this summary?

Read the article

This summary has been shared with you by getAbstract.

We find, rate and summarize relevant knowledge to help people make better decisions in business and in their private lives.

For yourself

Discover your next favorite book with getAbstract.

See prices

For your company

Stay up-to-date with emerging trends in less time.

Learn more

Students

We're committed to helping #nextgenleaders.

See prices

Already a customer? Log in here.

Comment on this summary

More on this topic

Related Channels