As new technologies continue to encroach on low-skilled jobs, the notion that societies inevitably will have to introduce universal basic incomes is making strides. At 2017’s World Economic Forum, a panel of experts discussed the social, economic, political and moral issues that permeate this debate. getAbstract recommends the conversation to policy makers, economists and social entrepreneurs who wish to remain a step ahead of a socioeconomic crisis.
In this summary, you will learn
- What social, political, economic and moral factors influence the feasibility of a universal basic income;
- Why distinguishing between “ethical” and “compensatory” arguments for a universal basic income is important; and
- How governments could fund universal basic income programs.
About the Speakers
Tamzin Booth is The Economist’s business editor. Guy Standing is a co-president of the Basic Income Earth Network. Michael Sandel is a professor of political philosophy at Harvard University. Neelie Kroes is a former EU commissioner for competition. Amitabh Kant is the CEO of NITI Aayog, an Indian governmental think tank.
By the same authors
Customers who read this summary also read
Comment on this summary
1 year agoGood points for discussion.