Right-click on the code to copy the image.
Note: On an ASP portal, the link behind the code is portal specific!
Editorial Rating
8
The rating – what does it mean?
At getAbstract, we summarize books* that help people understand the world and make it better. Whatever we select for our library has to excel in one or the other of these two core criteria:
Enlightening – You’ll learn things that will inform and improve your decisions.
Helpful – You’ll take-away practical advice that will help you get better at what you do.
We rate each piece of content on a scale of 1–10 with regard to these two core criteria. Our rating helps you sort the titles on your reading list from solid (5) to brilliant (10). Books we rate below 5 won’t be summarized. Here's what the ratings mean:
10 – Brilliant. A helpful and/or enlightening book that, in addition to meeting the highest standards in all pertinent aspects, stands out even among the best. Often an instant classic and must-read for everyone.
9 – Superb. A helpful and/or enlightening book that is extremely well rounded, has many strengths and no shortcomings worth mentioning.
8 – Very good. A helpful and/or enlightening book that has a substantial number of outstanding qualities without excelling across the board, e.g. presents the latest findings in a topical field and is written by a renowned expert but lacks a bit in style.
7 – Good. A helpful and/or enlightening book that combines two or more noteworthy strengths, e.g. contains uncommonly novel ideas and presents them in an engaging manner.
6 – Notable. A helpful and/or enlightening book that stands out by at least one aspect, e.g. is particularly well structured.
5 – Solid. A helpful and/or enlightening book, in spite of its obvious shortcomings. For instance, it may offer decent advice in some areas while being repetitive or unremarkable in others.
*getAbstract is summarizing much more than books. We look at every kind of content that may matter to our audience: books, but also articles, reports, videos and podcasts. What we say here about books applies to all formats we cover.
My Highlights
Select the sections that are relevant to you. Your highlights will appear here.
Are you sure you want to remove the highlight?
Comment on this summary
E. P.
8 years ago
They looked more precisely at the interpreted notes backing Stewart's story and found they were made out of different brands of ink. On October 27, with the choice days away, the Value Division asked for a court request to review Clinton's messages. Both are paragons of uprightness stood out from Trump, Comey battles. Stewart's illumination that the arranging was an accidental occasion didn't sit well with specialists. An unassuming pioneer is accessible to logically and more essential potential results, Comey creates. Revealing the restored examination concerning Clinton's messages was the best movement. In Comey's view, Fence gave off an impression of being reluctant to look out subordinates who may challenge his decisions. In the midst of a private dinner at the White House, Comey makes, Trump told Comey, "I require unwaveringness. Bush, Barack Obama, and Trump, Comey grasps the necessity for open specialists to desert their political inclinations. At one point, Comey forms, the FBI created a letter attempting to blackmail Ruler and empowering the social freedoms pioneer to execute himself. Trump demonstrated this character deformity not long after his presentation when he requested his swarm of spectators overshadowed Obama's. Comey advances an inducing barrier that he wasn't searching for thought when he announced a restored examination of Clinton's email practices. On this issue, Comey creates, reasonable differences of opinion or illustration weren't in play; Trump lied. Shading Comey's investigation was his want that Clinton would win paying little regard to what move he made. A considerable amount of Comey's book has nothing to do with Trump. Trump shooting and a while later devastating Comey is the slingshot that vaulted Comey's book onto the raving success records. In ways imperative and immaterial, President Donald Trump shows unwilling or unfit, to tell the truth, makes Comey. In the midst of the pre-summer of 2016, Comey formally close the examination concerning Hillary Clinton's normal with respect to scrutinizing gathered messages on an individual server.
Comment on this summary