The beauty of science is that it’s transparent and reproducible. At least, that’s how it’s supposed to work. But according to the Reproducibility Project, only 40% of published study results can be replicated. Today’s science also overemphasizes positive results: Equally relevant insights that you can glean from failed experiments will never make any headlines. Billionaire John Arnold is out to reduce scientific bias using the same healthy respect for data that made him millions of dollars at Enron. getAbstract recommends this summary to scientists and science aficionados.
In this summary, you will learn
- Why billionaires Laura and John Arnold were struggling to find charitable organizations that merited donations,
- How the Arnolds came to donate their money to “fix science itself,” and
- Which researchers have received funding and why.
About the Author
Sam Apple writes for Wired and teaches science writing at the University of Pennsylvania.
Get the key points from this article in 10 minutes.
For your company
We help you build a culture of continuous learning.
Comment on this summary
Customers who read this summary also read
L. Rafael Reif
Foreign Affairs, 2017
The Atlantic, 2017
MIT Technology Review, 2017