Summary of The Case for Engineering Our Food

Looking for the video?
We have the summary! Get the key insights in just 5 minutes.

The Case for Engineering Our Food summary
Start getting smarter:
or see our plans

Rating

8 Overall

9 Importance

8 Innovation

8 Style


Recommendation

Plant geneticist Pamela Ronald ardently believes that scientific innovation in genetic engineering is the only way to feed the world’s burgeoning population. However, misconceptions about genetically modified foods will halt this progress. Ronald aims to alleviate these fears while sharing success stories from the field. getAbstract recommends her persuasive oration to concerned consumers and to naysayers who denounce genetic modification.

In this summary, you will learn

  • How breeders use genetic modification to improve and safeguard crops,
  • How genetic engineering has created more-robust rice varieties, and
  • How genetic modification will help feed future generations without harming the environment.
 

About the Speaker

Pamela Ronald is a researcher at the University of California, Davis, and is a co-author of Tomorrow’s Table.

 

Summary

Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) receive a bad rap, yet many of the arguments against GMOs are unfounded. People on both sides of the debate want the same thing – that is, to grow healthy foods to feed the world’s burgeoning population without harming the planet. Agriculturalists have practiced...

More on this topic

Customers who read this summary also read

Humans Made the Banana Perfect – But Soon, It’ll Be Gone
Humans Made the Banana Perfect – But Soon, It’ll Be Gone
8
Why American Farmers Are Hacking Their Tractors with Ukrainian Firmware
Why American Farmers Are Hacking Their Tractors with Ukrainian Firmware
7
Barack Obama on Food and Climate Change
Barack Obama on Food and Climate Change
7
Buy. Squeeze. Repeat.
Buy. Squeeze. Repeat.
8
Functional Versus Unit Organizations
Functional Versus Unit Organizations
8
We Do Things Differently
We Do Things Differently
9

Related Channels

Comment on this summary