Replacing one set of “facts” with another may not get you closer to the truth.
People generally assume that oft-repeated “facts” are accurate, so truth-seeking skeptics and scholars play an important role in debunking false stories. But what happens when these myth busters replace one falsehood with another? Who holds them accountable – and are skeptics less likely to accept their own factual fallibility than others? getAbstract recommends this essay to truth-seekers interested in the evolving nature of facts – even, or perhaps especially, those touted by intellectual giants.
In this summary, you will learn
- Why “fake facts” are alluring
- Why experts are susceptible to perpetuating them
- How scholarly experts create “supermyths.”
Comment on this summary
Customers who read this summary also read
The New Yorker, 2015
The Guardian, 2016
Jeffrey M. Zacks