Replacing one set of “facts” with another may not get you closer to the truth.
People generally assume that oft-repeated “facts” are accurate, so truth-seeking skeptics and scholars play an important role in debunking false stories. But what happens when these myth busters replace one falsehood with another? Who holds them accountable – and are skeptics less likely to accept their own factual fallibility than others? getAbstract recommends this essay to truth-seekers interested in the evolving nature of facts – even, or perhaps especially, those touted by intellectual giants.
In this summary, you will learn
- Why “fake facts” are alluring
- Why experts are susceptible to perpetuating them
- How scholarly experts create “supermyths.”
Comment on this summary
Customers who read this summary also read
The Guardian, 2016
The New Yorker, 2015
Sarah Darwin and Stephen Cave
Brad Stone et al.
Bloomberg Business, 2016