People generally assume that oft-repeated “facts” are accurate, so truth-seeking skeptics and scholars play an important role in debunking false stories. But what happens when these myth busters replace one falsehood with another? Who holds them accountable – and are skeptics less likely to accept their own factual fallibility than others? getAbstract recommends this essay to truth-seekers interested in the evolving nature of facts – even, or perhaps especially, those touted by intellectual giants.
In this summary, you will learn
- Why “fake facts” are alluring,
- Why experts are susceptible to perpetuating them and
- How scholarly experts create “supermyths.”
About the Author
Daniel Engber writes about science and culture for Slate, Wired and other publications.
Comment on this summary
Customers who read this summary also read
David Epstein and ProPublica
The Atlantic, 2017
Max Chafkin and Mark Bergen
Bloomberg Businessweek , 2017