Summary of Why Most Published Research Findings Are False

Looking for the article?
We have the summary! Get the key insights in just 5 minutes.

Why Most Published Research Findings Are False summary
Start getting smarter:
or see our plans

Rating

8 Overall

10 Importance

8 Innovation

7 Style

Recommendation

“It can be proven that most claimed research findings are false.” Those are fighting words, but if anyone has the right to say them, John Ioannidis does. He’s co-director of the Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford and one of the researchers other scientists cite most often. This is one of his best-known papers. getAbstract recommends his insights (maybe not necessarily the rather dry paper itself) to researchers, research readers and anyone who would like to be more scientifically literate. Readers interested in Ioannidis’s framework for assessing the proportion of false positive findings should refer to the original paper.

In this summary, you will learn

  • Why many research claims are false;
  • How questionable research design, bias and repeated tests lead to false positive results; and
  • How to assess the credibility of research results.
 

About the Author

John P. A. Ioannidis is a professor at Stanford University. He directs the Stanford Prevention Research Center and co-directs the Meta-Research Innovation Center (METRICS) at Stanford.

 

Summary

When various study types are subjected to simulations that assess power, ratio of true to untrue relationships, and bias very few have a positive predictive value of more than 50%. Indicators of substandard scientific studies include:

Get the key points from this article in 10 minutes.

For you

Find the right subscription plan for you.

For your company

We help you build a culture of continuous learning.

 or log in

Comment on this summary

More on this topic

Customers who read this summary also read

More by category