Cutting the federal budget deficit is possible, but that could require changing how government operates.
The debate over the US federal budget is polarized. Republicans and Democrats want to cut the deficit and national debt – but agree on little else. The Hamilton Project brought experts together to examine the root causes of the deficit. Drawing on existing research and recommendations, they offer ideas based more on facts than on ideology. Their suggestions highlight a range of issues, including misplaced incentives and moral hazards that encourage excessive expenditure and imprudent behavior. The proposals are not easy reading – the terminology is often technical, and some of the ideas are more controversial than they might seem at first blush – yet the insights are fresh. getAbstract recommends this compilation to policy makers, economists, and students of finance and economic development.
In this summary, you will learn
- What 15 proposals the Hamilton Project offers for addressing the US budget deficit,
- What main factors contribute to the deficit,
- How to control the deficit in the short term and
- How to reduce the deficit in the long term.
About the Authors
Michael Greenstone and Adam Looney are senior fellows at the Brookings Institute’s Hamilton Project, a nonprofit public policy organization, where Karen Li is a policy coordinator and Max Harris and Jeremy Patashnik are research assistants.
Comment on this summary
By the same authors
Michael Greenstone and Adam Looney
The Hamilton Project, 2013
Customers who read this summary also read
Kevin J. Lansing and Agnieszka Markiewicz
Finance & Development Magazine, 2016
International Monetary Fund