Some people abide the horrors of torture because they think it can reveal critical information. But does it really work? Not according to game theory.
Fairleigh Dickinson University professor John W. Schiemann applies game theory to the horrors of torture to show that torture cannot yield valuable information. His analysis proves thought provoking and convincing. Schiemann reviews philosophical, ethical and political arguments for and against torture, and he evaluates how torture functions in practice as an information-gathering technique. Because Schiemann describes dreadful torture techniques and conducts his analysis using symbolic reasoning and quite complex game theory, his approach isn’t for every reader, although he restates most points in simpler prose. While any discussion of torture is sensitive and difficult to bear, including this one, getAbstract recommends these groundbreaking research insights to those interested in the military, politics, the war on terrorism, game theory and ethical decision making.
In this summary, you will learn
- How proponents justify torture on security and information grounds
- What a game theory model and evaluation of torture reveals
- How and why torture never succeeds
Comment on this summary
5 months agoWhat a strange mixture. Probably that is enough to read it.
Customers who read this summary also read
W.W. Norton, 2016
Little, Brown, 2014
MIT Press, 2009
Margaret M. Polski
FT Press, 2008