“It’s the economy, stupid!” As strategic leader of Bill Clinton’s first presidential campaign, James Carville coined this notorious slogan, which contains some truth about presidential politics that continues to hold: Americans care deeply about the economy and will likely choose the candidate who – they think – will create more jobs and prosperity. But how much power over the economy does a president actually have? Forces beyond the president’s control largely determine the economic trajectory during any four-year period, argues economics writer Neil Irwin in The New York Times. getAbstract recommends Irwin’s editorial to anybody interested in moving beyond political rhetoric and looking at the factors that actually make the economy tick.
In this summary, you will learn
- What factors limit US presidents’ ability to shape the economy,
- How forces beyond the president’s control help determine the trajectory of the economy and
- How presidential policies affect the economy over the long term.
About the Author
Neil Irwin is a senior economics correspondent for The New York Times. He is the author of The Alchemists: Three Central Bankers and a World on Fire.
Comment on this summary
Customers who read this summary also read
The Guardian, 2016
White House Council of Economic Advisors
White House, 2016
Peter S. Goodman
The New York Times, 2016
World Economic Forum, 2017